Hm, so to me it looks like the cons still outweigh the pros in sheer... weight, but even if they don't, then some / more consideration should have been shown (as in outspoken acknowledgement; as in formal, not private) to those most affected by the cons. Instead, in-org communication has... glossed over the affectedness of some of the committees most affected by the cons.

I'm not even sure how much I *can* comment? And how much we're actually *supposed* to only do in private messaging / rants?

(Yeah, I thought I was done after ranting at you in private, but it seems I do have ~feelings spilling over.)